Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking

Notes

  • [[January 5th, 2026]]
    • Interesting concept about abstraction that I didn’t think about before. For some abstraction, the meaning and interpretation is completely contextual.
      • One example is for #Coffee. “Let’s grab coffee”
        • Coffee_sub_4:
          • Here, it could mean from coffee to any lightweight meal to get together. Not necesairliy coffee
        • Coffee_sub_3:
          • Coffee means from grabbing not just coffee, as well as tea, other drinks etc.
        • Coffee_sub_2
          • Means coffee but different variations such as mocha, milk coffee, chocolate coffee, chai latte,
        • Coffee_sub_1
          • Paris coffee where it only means one single thing: black coffee
            • like how they serve in Paris
      • Another example: “Mother
        • Mother_sub_4: “Necessity is the mother of invention.”
          • Here, it is a completely abstract metaphorical source or origin. It implies causation and creation without any biological or human context.
        • Mother_sub_3: “She was like a mother to me.” / “The motherboard of a computer.”
          • Refers to the role of protection, central support, or nurturing, regardless of biological relationship.
          • Adoptive mothers or even objects that serve a central, hosting function.
        • Mother_sub_2: “She is a mother of three.”
          • social and legal status of having children, raising them, and the ongoing relationship
            • may or may not include the biological act of giving birth (e.g., in cases of IVF or adoption where the social role is the focus).
        • Mother_sub_1: The biological female parent.
          • the female who contributed the egg and/or gestated the offspring.
    • How do you differentiate if something is thought of as a category or analogy?
      • Category = Boring analogy (distance is zero)
      • Analogy = Stretched category (distance is far)
      • Eg: When you think of “cup”, do you think of analogy or category?
        • You can surely create a cluster of behavior pattern for cup and apply to various objects to meet that cluster?
        • Standard Mug (Category)
          • Ceramic, handle, round
          • Matches mental template perfectly
          • Brain says: “This is a cup.” (boring)
  • [[January 7th, 2026]]
    • Interesting bits about analogy / patterns in murder/crime
      • Tylenol murder in Chicago in 1982
        • People dying after consuming tylenol
          • Turns out cyanide present on the capsule packaging
        • Assumptions
          • Assumption 1 (The Category Mistake): “Industrial Accident” / “Bad Batch.”
            • Police/Media thought: Poison got in at the factory.
            • Action: Recall everything nationwide.
            • Logic: Mass production = Mass defect.
          • The Anomaly:
            • Pills came from different factories (PA and TX).
          • The Shift in “New Category”:
            • Product Tampering
            • Someone bought them, tampered and added cyanide and put back on shelf
        • Copycat Pattern: A lady killed her husband with similar pattern by tampering with the capsule bought
          • Thought police would categorize it as random event like that of 1982
          • Police investigation revealed she bought two poisoned bottles herself
        • See this documentary Inside The Tylenol Murders #Video #Documentary
    • [[Important Questions]] Do analogies manipulate us?

My Thoughts

  • This was an interesting read.
  • Some questions that made me [[EN/Think real hard]] are:
    • How do you differentiate analogy vs categories?
    • How do analogies shape our [[Mental Model]]s about the reality.
      • This reminded me of [[Evergreen Note/We shape our tools and tools shape us.]]
  • There were instances where it made it hard for me to follow the topics because of the way [[Douglas Hofstadter]] writes his books; similar to [[Book/I Am A Strange Loop]]