Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking
Started: December 28th, 2025
·
Completed: January 19th, 2026
Table of Contents
Notes
[[January 5th, 2026]]
Interesting concept about abstraction that I didn’t think about before. For some abstraction, the meaning and interpretation is completely contextual.
One example is for #Coffee. “Let’s grab coffee”
Coffee_sub_4:
Here, it could mean from coffee to any lightweight meal to get together. Not necesairliy coffee
Coffee_sub_3:
Coffee means from grabbing not just coffee, as well as tea, other drinks etc.
Coffee_sub_2
Means coffee but different variations such as mocha, milk coffee, chocolate coffee, chai latte,
Coffee_sub_1
Paris coffee where it only means one single thing: black coffee
like how they serve in Paris
Another example: “Mother ”
Mother_sub_4 : “Necessity is the mother of invention.”
Here, it is a completely abstract metaphorical source or origin. It implies causation and creation without any biological or human context.
Mother_sub_3 : “She was like a mother to me.” / “The motherboard of a computer.”
Refers to the role of protection, central support, or nurturing, regardless of biological relationship.
Adoptive mothers or even objects that serve a central, hosting function.
Mother_sub_2 : “She is a mother of three.”
social and legal status of having children, raising them, and the ongoing relationship
may or may not include the biological act of giving birth (e.g., in cases of IVF or adoption where the social role is the focus).
Mother_sub_1 : The biological female parent.
the female who contributed the egg and/or gestated the offspring.
How do you differentiate if something is thought of as a category or analogy?
Category = Boring analogy (distance is zero)
Analogy = Stretched category (distance is far)
Eg: When you think of “cup”, do you think of analogy or category?
You can surely create a cluster of behavior pattern for cup and apply to various objects to meet that cluster?
Standard Mug (Category)
Ceramic, handle, round
Matches mental template perfectly
Brain says: “This is a cup.” (boring)
[[January 7th, 2026]]
Interesting bits about analogy / patterns in murder/crime
Tylenol murder in Chicago in 1982
People dying after consuming tylenol
Turns out cyanide present on the capsule packaging
Assumptions
Assumption 1 (The Category Mistake): “Industrial Accident” / “Bad Batch.”
Police/Media thought: Poison got in at the factory.
Action: Recall everything nationwide.
Logic: Mass production = Mass defect.
The Anomaly:
Pills came from different factories (PA and TX).
The Shift in “New Category”:
Product Tampering
Someone bought them, tampered and added cyanide and put back on shelf
Copycat Pattern: A lady killed her husband with similar pattern by tampering with the capsule bought
Thought police would categorize it as random event like that of 1982
Police investigation revealed she bought two poisoned bottles herself
See this documentary Inside The Tylenol Murders #Video #Documentary
[[Important Questions]] Do analogies manipulate us?
My Thoughts
This was an interesting read.
Some questions that made me [[EN/Think real hard]] are:
How do you differentiate analogy vs categories?
How do analogies shape our [[Mental Model]]s about the reality.
This reminded me of [[Evergreen Note/We shape our tools and tools shape us.]]
There were instances where it made it hard for me to follow the topics because of the way [[Douglas Hofstadter]] writes his books; similar to [[Book/I Am A Strange Loop]]